Nana’s Fudgy Wadgy Cookie Bar PDF E-mail
Written by The DFC   
Sunday, 30 August 2009
Too Dry and Labeling Disaster

It was Sunday night movie night and I was looking for something sweet to have for a snack. I found Nana’s Fudgy Wadgy cookie bar in my kitchen and thought I would give it the DFC taste test. I thought the bar was dry. However, it did have a strong chocolate taste and chocolate chips that really made me smile.

The nutritional information was no where to be found, which made this treat a real downer. How can a product be placed on the market with out even listing the nutritional information? So far this bar is not up to par.

The consumer information was no where to be found on the packaging. Clearly, this was disappointing and unacceptable. The only information listed on the bar was the ingredients.

Overall, I give Nana’s Fudgy Wadgy Cookie Bar a 450 DFC. I thought the bar tasted pretty good, but needed to be less dry. However, the nutritional information and consumer information were horrific and an example of worst practices for nutritional information and consumer information labeling. I hope everyone uses this as an example of how not to label your product.


Have a comment or suggestion? e-mail

DFC in the News
      
Mailing List
Search

Diabetes News
Diabetes News


Home  |  About Us  |  Previous Reviews  |  Press  |  Contact Us  |  Terms of Use  |  Useful Links
Bookmark This Site!  |  Make The Diabetic Food Critic Your Homepage  |  Check out the DFC Rating Scale

By using this service, you accept our Terms of Use.  Please read them.  The consumer health information on DiabeticFoodCritic.com
is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions.  You should
promptly seek professional medical care if you have any concern about your health.
Copyright © 2006-2007, The Diabetic Food Critic.
Designed by Scott Broschart